Banks| Dodgy Deals| Campaigns
About us| Blog| Publications| Successes| Contact us| Donate
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Join our Active Allies list
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
Donate
2021-02-24 00:00:00
Protect the climate but finance Total?
2021-02-16 00:00:00
Oil and gas financiers are staring down the barrel at $1 trillion in losses: time to rein in support for new pipelines
2021-02-11 00:00:00
Beefing up risk: the exposure of JBS’ financiers to financial, regulatory and reputational risks
2021-01-25 00:00:00
Why should banks support EU mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence?
2020-09-24 12:53:20
Oscislowo open-pit coal mine cancelled
2020-09-08 13:07:41
Strengthened OECD guidance on responsible banking
2020-02-25 10:35:27
JPMorgan Chase Coal and Arctic Policy a step forward but fails to match its climate responsibility as the world’s #1 Fossil Bank
2020-02-18 17:27:23
Civil society groups welcome Royal Bank of Scotland preparing to exit fossil fuels
Connect
2021-02-01 00:00:00
Banking on Thin Ice
2020-11-30 00:00:00
Soft Commitments, Hard Lessons: an analysis of the Soft Commodities Compact
2020-11-24 00:00:00
"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part II
2020-11-18 00:00:00
Crude Risk: Risks to banks and investors from the East African Crude Oil Pipeline
2020-09-16 00:00:00
Principles for Paris-Aligned Financial Institutions: Climate Impact, Fossil Fuels and Deforestation
2020-08-17 00:00:00
"Trust Us, We're Equator Banks": Part I
See all publications
Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Home › News
Dutch Banks and Insurers Fail to Take Recycling Seriously
Start

By: Fair Finance Guide
2015-01-15
Amsterdam

Contact:

For more information and interview requests, contact:persvoorlichting@milieudefensie.nl or call +31(0)20 5507333


Share this page:

FFI. Photo: FFI

Dutch banks and insurers invest 69 times more in mining of metals than in recycling them for electronics, reveals a new case study by the Fair Bank and Insurance Guide. This practice runs contrary to the sustainability ambitions of the financial concerns, states the Fair Bank and Insurance Guide. Mining does substantial damage to nature and the environment, and more reuse of metals could make mining unnecessary in part. Moreover, responsible electronics processing would prevent environmental pollution associated with demolition yards and rubbish dumps in Africa and Asia.

60 million

Banks and insurers ING, Legal & General, Rabobank and Aegon have little invested in metal recycling. Just as ABN AMRO, they instead have invested billions euro's in the Glencore mining concern, a company which is controversial because of its environmental pollution and human rights violations, according to an earlier case study by the Fair Banking Guide. This is far more than the 60 million Euro's that all the banks and insurers surveyed invest in recycling in total. A number of insurers and the three large banks ING, ABN AMRO and Rabobank supplied no information on investments; these banks were therefore evaluated on the basis of public records. It is also striking that ASN and Triodos Bank scarcely invest in recycling either, nor in mining. ASN and Triodos Bank state that most businesses in the recycling sector do not meet their criteria, for example, for environmental pollution.

Opportunities

Due to the lack of proactive government policy and investment, the recycling sector has been slow to develop. This is the reason much electronic equipment leaves as scrap for Africa and China. The insurers ASR and Achmea and the NIBC bank are however active in the recycling sector. ASR even appears to invest more in recycling than in mining; NIBC invests only in metals recycling. ASR, Achmea, ASN, Triodos Bank and Rabobank also promote reuse and the ‘circular economy' to their business clients. ING does that as well, but at the same time invests 279 times more money in mining than in recycling. A number of banks indicated that they don't see opportunities in large investments because the sector is small and fragmented. Evert Hassink of the Fair Bank and Insurance Guide disagrees, ‘NIBC, ASR and Achmea show that investments in reuse instead of destructive mining is in fact possible; this shows that banks and insurers really can do more than point to the government or to the sector itself.'

Research question and commitments

The study by the Fair Bank and Insurance Guide shows how much financial institutions invest in mining and recycling companies and the degree to which banks and insurers make use of their influence. The study exclusively focused on metals used in electronics. As a result of this study, six banks and insurers (ASN, Aegon, ASR, NIBC, SNS Reaal and Triodos Bank) have committed to improve investments in recycling companies and/or related policies.

Notes to the editor:

  • The Fair Bank and Insurance Guide is an iniative of Oxfam Novib, Amnesty International, Dutch labour union FNV, Friends of the Earth Netherlands (Milieudefensie), Dierenbescherming (the Dutch animal protection society) and PAX (formerly known as IKV Pax Christi)
  • This case study was carried out by Profundo economic research bureau.

 Report by the Fair Bank and Insurance Guide: Case Study: Mineral Extraction Companies and Human Rights'

Browse
Home
Banks
Dodgy Deals
Map
Campaigns
About
About BankTrack
Donate
Contact BankTrack
Publications
Victories
Follow Us
News
BankTrack blog
Facebook page
Twitter channel
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands

Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
©2016 BankTrack                Webdesign by BankTrack and EASYmind
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted