BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
International Bank Campaigners Gathering
Donate
2023-05-25 00:00:00
Philippines communities are fighting back against gas & LNG build-out in the Verde Island Passage
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-05-17 14:30:30
EACOP Financial Advisor SMBC is no longer involved with the project
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
Connect
2023-06-01 00:00:00
BankTrack's submission to the public consultation on TNFD V0.4
2023-05-03 00:00:00
A Rotten Business: How Barclays became the go-to bank for JBS, one of the world's most destructive meat corporations
2023-04-13 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2023
2023-04-12 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 4
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Banks and steel
End Coal Finance
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy International Bank Campaigners Gathering Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner blog ›
Partner News

Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector

Financial Institutions must push steelmakers towards the right technologies
2023-03-17
By: Reclaim Finance
Contact:

Cynthia Rocamora, Industry Campaigner, Reclaim Finance 

Українська: метал, 30 January 2017. . Photo: Photo: Inna67895 via Wikimedia (CC BY 4.0)
2023-03-17
By: Reclaim Finance
Contact:

Cynthia Rocamora, Industry Campaigner, Reclaim Finance 

Limiting global warming to 1.5°C requires ending the world’s reliance on fossil fuels. Achieving this challenge will only be possible through the adoption of comprehensive approaches that tackle fossil fuel production while simultaneously addressing demand-side sectors that consume fossil fuels themselves, such as the steel sector.

Current ways of producing steel are heavily carbon-intensive due to their reliance on coal – also called metallurgical coal, met coal, or coking coal, which is of a different quality than thermal coal. Decarbonizing steelmaking while meeting demand with cleaner and competitive alternatives is possible and must become a priority. 

The decarbonization of steel production will only be possible if financial institutions step up to finance the right solutions. They must urgently refuse to perpetuate the steel sector’s reliance on coal and finance cleaner technologies instead.

Financial institutions increasingly voice their discontent at climate action that is limited to the supply of fossil fuels. However, they are yet to adopt policies to address demand-side sectors. Their coal policies also only target thermal coal, mostly due to the belief that there are no alternatives to metallurgical coal. Fortunately, alternative technologies now exist and can be developed and deployed if the necessary financial resources are made available.  This is an opportunity for them to back up their words with action. 

The first step for them is to stop supporting any new metallurgical coal mines, expansion plans, or new coal-based steelmaking projects, expansion projects, or the relining of blast furnaces. The second is to make new financial services to clients and investee companies conditional on a commitment to stop developing such facilities, and to engage steelmaking companies to invest in the right technologies, across all geographies. 

Key recomendations for financial institutions 

  • End all direct support to new metallurgical coal mines and metallurgical coal mine expansions, and offer financial services to clients and investee companies active in the sector on condition that they commit to halting the development of such projects. Most financial institutions already have policies that cover thermal coal. Now is the time to complete these policies by also addressing metallurgical coal, guaranteeing that all coal commitments are comprehensive and consistent. Though metallurgical coal will continue to be used for steelmaking in the coming years, the sector needs to transition to new ways of producing steel now – and, indeed, is already starting to do so. Investing in new metallurgical projects is thus counter-productive and risky.
  • End all direct support to coal-based steelmaking facilities, including: new BF-BOFs, BF-BOF expansions, BF-BOF retrofits; and apply a condition to financial services offered to clients and investee companies that they commit to halting the development of coal-based steelmaking facilities, including expansions, modernizations or retrofits of existing facilities. Steel sector emissions predominantly come from the BF-BOF route, which uses metallurgical coal. Tackling steel sector emissions thus requires changing the way steel is produced. Building new coal-based facilities or extending the lifetime of existing ones is therefore incompatible with decarbonizing the steel sector.
  • Ask clients and investee companies to develop the right technologies. When building a new project or replacing a BF-BOF that has reached the end of its lifetime, financial institutions have a key role to play in asking steelmakers to develop the most adequate technologies. Priority must be given to the least carbon-intensive solutions, maximizing the secondary steel route through electric arc furnaces running on renewable energy, and avoiding wasting time and resources on unproven and unsustainable solutions such as CCS.
  • Ask steel and metallurgical coal companies to adopt and publish robust climate strategies, with a commitment to a 2050 net zero objective aligned to a 1.5°C pathway. Pushing companies to publish more information on their climate commitments, and to consult shareholders through Say on Climate, can be a way to compel industry actors to raise their climate ambitions to a suitable standard. This includes:
    • Calling on clients and investee companies to adopt a robust and comprehensive climate plan, including submission to a shareholder vote. This climate plan should at least include the following indicators:
      • Short- and medium-term GHG emissions reduction targets on Scopes 1, 2 and 3, expressed in both absolute and intensity terms, encompassing all activities. 
      • Possible contribution of captured GHG volumes to achieving emissions reduction targets.
      • Carbon offsetting approaches that may be implemented to complement the reduction targets.
      • Targeted energy mix evolution for the short- and medium-term.
      • Short- and medium-term capex plans disaggregated by activity and by allocation between maintenance and development of company assets.
      • Short- and medium-term opex disaggregated by activity and by cost item.
      • Explanation of a baseline scenario used to set climate targets, and how it considers the best available science.
    • Asking companies to make climate strategy an integral part of their governance. This includes:  
      • Making sure the board has a clear oversight of climate change and has named a board position with responsibility for climate change, ensuring that the board overall has sufficient capabilities to assess and manage climate-related risks and opportunities.
      • Incorporating climate change performance within the company’s executive remuneration scheme.
      • Committing to reflect the way in which climate change and global decarbonization efforts are being captured in critical accounting assumptions and judgements within the company’s accounting practices and related disclosures.

Reclaim Finance’s detailed recommendations on companies’ climate commitments can be found here.

Download the full briefing here

Reposted from Reclaim Finance's website here.

Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Banks and steel End Coal Finance Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy International Bank Campaigners Gathering Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted