BANKS DODGY DEALS CAMPAIGNS
About BankTrack
Visit us
Organisation
Our team
Our board
Guiding principles
Team up with us
Jobs at BankTrack
Our annual reports
Funding and finances
History
BankTrack in the media
Our privacy policy
International Bank Campaigners Gathering
Donate
2023-05-25 00:00:00
Philippines communities are fighting back against gas & LNG build-out in the Verde Island Passage
2023-03-17 00:00:00
Briefing: The role of financial institutions in decarbonising the steel sector
2023-03-09 00:00:00
Dutch bank ING supports controversial pipeline to import gas from authoritarian Azerbaijan
2023-02-23 00:00:00
Financial institutions need to address steelmaking’s coal addiction
2023-05-17 14:30:30
EACOP Financial Advisor SMBC is no longer involved with the project
2023-03-28 13:43:00
French bank Société Générale withdraws from Rio Grande LNG
2023-03-20 08:50:41
Who dares to finance Eni and Exxon’s dangerous Rovuma gas plans in Mozambique?
2023-03-14 14:59:00
New ING policy could spark bank shift away from financing oil and gas infrastructure
Connect
2023-06-01 00:00:00
BankTrack's submission to the public consultation on TNFD V0.4
2023-05-03 00:00:00
A Rotten Business: How Barclays became the go-to bank for JBS, one of the world's most destructive meat corporations
2023-04-13 00:00:00
Banking on Climate Chaos 2023
2023-04-12 00:00:00
The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP): Finance Risk Update No. 4
See all publications
Sections
Banks Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate
Banks and Human Rights
Banks and Nature
Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA
Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine
Tracking the Equator Principles
Tracking the PRBs
Banks and steel
End Coal Finance
Find a Better Bank
Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy International Bank Campaigners Gathering Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter Login
Home › Partner news ›
Partner News

Banks Lack Robust Framework for Minimizing Social Risks

Equator Principles fail to adequately address human rights
2008-08-07 | Washington
Contact:

Anne Perrault, CIEL, +1 202-742-5850; aperrault@ciel.org 
Steve Herz, BIC, +1 510-338-1237; steve.herz@sbcglobal.net
Johan Frijns, BankTrack, +31-24-3249220, coord@banktrack.org

Photo: Equator Principles
2008-08-07 | Washington
Contact:

Anne Perrault, CIEL, +1 202-742-5850; aperrault@ciel.org 
Steve Herz, BIC, +1 510-338-1237; steve.herz@sbcglobal.net
Johan Frijns, BankTrack, +31-24-3249220, coord@banktrack.org

A new study finds that international project financiers, including the leading international banks and the International Finance Corporation, do not have a robust framework for minimizing the social risks posed by their projects. The study—The International Finance Corporation’s Performance Standards and the Equator Principles: Respecting Human Rights and Remedying Violations?—notes that recently-adopted standards are not likely to reduce potential human rights-related conflicts that may arise in projects.

The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) and the Bank Information Center (BIC), with support from World Resources Institute, Oxfam Australia and BankTrack, used the Danish Institute for Human Rights’ Human Rights Compliance Assessment tool to analyze the extent to which the International Finance Corporation’s (IFC) Performance Standards address human rights concerns.

The analysis reveals that the IFC Performance Standards and Equator Principles fail to address most critical human rights adequately and fail, even, to ensure that human rights concerns are assessed.

The IFC is the private sector financing arm of the World Bank Group, and is widely viewed as the leader among international project financiers for its environmental and social risk management standards. The “Equator Principle” financial institutions, which represent over 70 percent of project finance in emerging markets, have committed to apply the IFC’s standards. In 2007, US$52.9 billion of project finance debt in emerging market economies was subject to the Equator Principles. In addition, the export credit agencies (ECAs) of the members of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development have agreed to adopt the IFC’s standards as a common environmental and social benchmark for export credits and loan guarantees.

To assess the relevance of human rights to project finance, the study reviewed 60 projects that generated complaints from locally-affected communities, and determined that these projects implicated most of the internationally recognized human rights. Among the rights most often implicated were the right to food, right to property, right to life, and right to health.

The groups submitted this study to the United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, Professor John Ruggie, requesting his attention to this issue.

Daniel Magraw, President of the Center for International Environmental Law, notes that, in a June 2008 report to the Human Rights Council, Special Representative Ruggie indicated that companies have a “baseline responsibility” to respect all internationally recognized human rights. Steve Herz, an author of the current study, stated, “The Performance Standards and Equator Principles must be significantly amended if they are to provide project sponsors with appropriate guidance for meeting their human rights responsibilities and minimizing human rights-related risks.”

Download report


  • Study: The international finance corporation's performance standards and the equator principles: respecting human rights and remedying violations? Download
  • Appendix 1: Case Studies Illustrating the Human Rights Implications of Large-Scale, Internationally-Financed Projects. Download
  • Appendix 2: International Human Rights Conventions Referenced in the Danish Institute’s Human Rights Compliance Assessment. Download
  • Appendix 3: Analysis of IFC Performance Standards/Equator Principles Using the Danish Institute of Human Rights’ Human Rights Compliance Assessment. Download

Further Information


  • Center for International Environmental Law: www.ciel.org
  • Bank Information Center: www.bicusa.org
  • World Resources Institute: www.wri.org
Sections
Banks Policies Dodgy Deals Campaigns
Our campaigns
Banks and Climate Banks and Human Rights Banks and Nature Banks and Pandemics
Our projects
Tracking the NZBA Banks and Putin's war in Ukraine Tracking the Equator Principles Tracking the PRBs Banks and steel End Coal Finance Find a Better Bank Banks and the OECD Guidelines
Media
News Publications
Fossil Banks No Thanks StopEACOP Forests & Finance Banks & Biodiversity Drop JBS Bank of Coal Don't Buy into Occupation
BankTrack
About BankTrack Visit us Organisation Our team Our board Guiding principles Team up with us Jobs at BankTrack Our annual reports Funding and finances History BankTrack in the media Our privacy policy International Bank Campaigners Gathering Donate
Successes Contact BankTrack
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 24 324 9220
Contact@banktrack.org
Donate Mailing list Facebook Twitter
©2022 BankTrack
BankTrack is a registered charity in the Netherlands (ANBI) - RSIN 813874658
Find our privacy policy here

Stay up to date

Sign up now for all BankTrack's news


Make a comment

Your comment will be reviewed, before being posted