Show bigger map or find driving directions
Nr. dodgy deals
Banks Have a Responsibility in Respecting Human Rights
BankTrack calls on UN special representative to include banking sector in final report to UN Commission on Human Rights
Utrecht, Dec 18 2006
BankTrack today sent a letter to Dr. John Ruggie, the United Nations Secretary General’s Special Representative on Human Rights & Business, urging him to call for a more comprehensive approach to human rights responsibilities in the banking sector.
After the business community rejected the Norms on the Human Rights Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Enterprises, Dr. Ruggie was appointed by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan to clarify and achieve some level of consensus on the scope of the private sector’s human rights obligations. He is currently preparing his Final Report to the UN Commission on Human Rights, which will be completed by Spring 2007.
Examples of corporate complicity in human rights are well known, but banks also facilitate and benefit from human rights violations,” said Inez Louwagie of Netwerk Vlaanderen, a BankTrack member organization that has published two recent reports on the topic. “In fact, many activities that violate human rights simply cannot occur without banks’ financial backing."
Although the banking sector has made some progress in developing environmental financing standards in the last several years, banks’ understanding of their role and responsibility regarding human rights is relatively poor. The BankTrack letter offered several examples of how companies associated with human rights problems (including mining company Freeport McMoRan, electronics subcontractor Flextronics, and India-based National Hydroelectric Power Corporation) were backed by loans and capital raised by major financial institutions.
" Currently, only about eight major banks have developed their own human rights policies,” said BankTrack coordinator Johan Frijns, referring to a January 2006 BankTrack survey of best practices in bank financing standards. “but even from these statements it is not very clear how human rights considerations affect business decisions. That is no longer an acceptable situation".
For example, no banks currently prohibit financing transactions involving controversial economic stabilisation clauses, which can be included in Host Government Agreements (legal frameworks between investors and host governments). Such clauses are designed to reduce financial risks due to unexpected and significant changes in law – even labour and human rights laws.
"The HGA for the Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan pipeline, for example, allows the BTC consortium to refuse any new human rights laws that the governments of Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey introduce in the next 40-60 years,” said Andrea Baranes of CRBM (Campagna per la Riforma
Good login. Redirecting to
Wrong login. Click here to request your password.
An email has been sent with your login!
This email is unknown.<< Back
Please provide one or more search terms
• .@ieefa_institute lays it on the line to Ex-Im India's big backers: Rampal puts top banks and asset managers at risk https://t.co/c2yp79QFIX
Oct 26, 2016