On recordThis profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date
Send feedback on this profile
Download as PDF
Created before Nov 2016
Last update: 2015-11-01 14:53:10 BankTrack
Yann Louvel, Climate and energy campaign coordinator, BankTrack
Share this page:
In the Canadian Boreal forest just downstream of the eastern foothills of the Rocky Mountains are the Canadian tar sands. The region contains some 2 trillion barrels of oil, but getting to it will mean destroying an area larger than the state of Florida.
Tar sands consist of heavy crude oil mixed with sand, clay and bitumen. Extraction entails burning natural gas to generate enough heat and steam to melt the oil out of the sand. As many as five barrels of water are needed to produce a single barrel of oil.
Tar sands oil is the worst type of oil for the climate, producing three times the greenhouse gas emissions of conventionally produced oil because of the energy required to extract and process tar sands oil. Communities downstream from the tar sands mines report elevated levels of cancer that they blame on toxic contamination of the Athabasca River.
What must happen
- Require clients to provide evidence of Free Prior Informed Consent (FPIC) from First Nations on projects and activities affecting their communities. FPIC reflects international law, minimizes conflict, and was adopted by TD Bank Financial Group as part of its Environmental Management Framework in 2007.
- Phase out financing and advisory to projects related to oil sands, which adversely impact, in a non-reversible manner, critical natural habitats or freshwater resources used for drinking water. French bank Dexia adopted this global best practice as a part of its Energy Sector Guidelines for project finance, in 2008.
- Develop an action plan to reduce financed emissions of climate change pollution related to lending activities.
In Canada, the toxic burden on communities near the tar sands is already enormous. In addition to direct human exposure, oil contamination in the local watershed has led to arsenic in moose meat — a dietary staple for First Nations peoples — up to 33 times acceptable levels. Deformed fish have been found in nearby Lake Athabasca; drinking water has been contaminated; and a huge swath of the vibrant Boreal forest is being transformed into a toxic moonscape. One of the largest dams in the world is restraining a giant reservoir filled with toxic sludge from processing tar sands into oil.
Processing tar sands oil means more asthma and respiratory diseases, more cancer, and more cardiovascular problems. Contaminated wastewater, containing arsenic, mercury and various carcinogens, has already been linked to elevated rates of cancer in downstream First Nations communities.
Greenhouse gas emissions
It takes around 3 times as much energy to produce a barrel of oil from tar sands as it does for typical oil extraction (85.5kg CO2 per barrel compared to 28.6kg CO2). The expansion of oil sands is the fastest growing contributor to Canada's greenhouse gas emissions, yet the Canadian government is failing to regulate its carbon emissions effectively with absolute targets. Canada is set to miss its Kyoto targets.
Technological solutions such as carbon capture and storage are still years away, yet the companies are seeking licenses to increase carbon emissions at a time when the scientific community agrees the developed world needs to cut emissions.
Forests & Water
The oil sands reserves cover an area of 140,000km2 of the boreal forest - equivalent to 25% of Alberta (approximately the size of France). The extraction of oil sands requires huge impacts above the ground with survey lines, mines, processing plants, pipelines and drilling sites. Oil sands mining has left swathes of forest removed, fragmenting the habitat of the native caribou. Companies have promised to restore the habitat, but only 104 ha of land has been certified as reclaimed.
Tar sands require from 2 to 4.5 barrels of water to produce a barrel of oil. The Athabasca river cannot supply the quantities of water required for the proposed expansion, and the ecological viability of the river is already threatened.
The waste water is so toxic it has to be stored in tailings ponds that threaten leaks into the river. Concerns have been raised by the First Nations indigenous communities that live downstream about serious health problems they fear are linked to contaminated water and fish.
Communities including the Athabasca Chipewyan, Mikisew Cree, Chipewyan Prairie Dene, Woodland Cree, Beaver Lake Cree, and Fort Mackay First Nations have all filed lawsuits over runaway tar sands developments. Failure to obtain free, prior and informed consent of these communities creates substantial material risks to continued development in the tar sands.
The Equator Principles are generally not applicable to financing in the tar sands!
Analysts expect USD $200 billion to flow toward trebling tar sands production by 2020.
Increased greenhouse gas emissions associated with tar sands development is the main reason Canada will not meet its Kyoto reduction commitments.
- In 2010, Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions are projected be nearly 35 percent higher than 1990 levels.
All data above are derived from Bloomberg in 2009. They have not been updated since then and therefore only provide a snapshot of the situation in 2009.