english
français
español
中国版
issues
sectors
Agriculture
Fisheries
Forestry, Pulp and Paper
Military industry and arms trade
Mining
Oil and gas
Power generation
Transparency
Accountability
|
banks
loading...
focus
loading...
members
loading...
dodgy deals
loading...
companies
loading...
further resources
documents
dodgy deals
companies
Mining mountain top removal coal mining (source: www.ran.org)
what is at stake
Mining and ore processing activities often have profound environmental impacts, affecting the quality of lands and water. Many mining operations take place in open pits, destroying natural aquifers and habitats in large areas. Local water courses are often severely polluted as mining companies use enormous amounts of water to process minerals and to dump acid, toxic or even radioactive tailings. This not only pollutes waterways and rivers, but also marine environments around estuaries. Mining can also pollute waterways through erosion. Many mines are located on uneven terrain, and when forest cover is lost, rain-drenched soils can slide and end up in local waterways. Erosion can even lead to landslides and fatal floods. The effects of mining persist for a long time, even after the mining activities are finished. Mine rehabilitation is often insufficient to restore the natural environment in and around the mining area. Some impacts - such as acid mine drainage - can continue for decades or even centuries, continuously polluting the surrounding waterways. -readmore- Smelting and processing also causes serious environmental damage. Even when using modern technology, these processes often cause significant air pollution. Mining also can have profound social, economic and health impacts. In many cases, mining operators do not acknowledge or respect the land rights of local inhabitants. Pollution from mines can lead to an accumulation of heavy metals in the air, soil and water, causing serious health problems if the water is used for drinking or sanitation, or when the air is breathed. It also affects health indirectly, when metals accumulate in crops and animals that are later consumed by the local population. Moreover, within communities it is women who are most deeply and directly affected, when water and food supplies are polluted by mine waste. In many mining companies, labour conditions are piteous. The jobs are dangerous, accidents occur and health and safety policy is inadequate. Often there is a lack of respect for fundamental labour rights, and even the presence of child labour. Finally, the extractive industries can distort macroeconomic development in developing countries. Developing countries that lack a sound political or legal systems may suffer a resource curse in which the exploitation of metals, minerals (and also oil and gas) leads to corruption, lost revenues, increased risk of social conflict, and unequal distribution of social and environmental benefits and costs to the local communities. As a result, mining activity often leaves a country no better off, and the local the area mired in controversies and conflict between mining corporations, communities and governments. Besides large-scale mining companies, the sector also includes small-scale and artisanal miners. According to Communities and Small scale Mining (CASM) they number between 13 and 20 million, operating in about 50 developing countries. More than 100 million people worldwide depend on artisanal and small-scale mining for survival, as part of their diversified or seasonal livelihood strategies. These small miners are vulnerable population groups. If well managed, artisanal and small-scale mining can be a catalyst to sustainable economic and social development at the local level. The mining sector consists of companies that exploit, transport, process and store natural resources. These resources are subsequently used in various other sectors, such as construction, car industry and electronics. These sectors are strongly dependent on mining, and hence partly accountable for the effects of mines and refineries on the environment and local communities. To contribute to a more sustainable and socially equitable world, the mining sector needs to change course in a profound way. Banks that invest in the mining industry should ensure that their investment policy deals with the issues described above.
selected standards and initiatives
There are a number of international
conventions and multi-stakeholder processes which set important standards for
mining operations:
Many environmental problems associated with mining are related to the generation and management of waste. Existing standards and guidelines regarding waste management can be found in:
-readmore- Closure of production facilities The Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development (MMSD) project calls for companies to include the effects of mine activity and closure on local communities already in the decision-making process for mine development. It calls on companies to consider the future use of the mine, the facilities to be supplied, and the responsibilities of the mining company in realising the post-mining plan. The United States requires companies to provide a financial guarantee for clean-up, restoration and ongoing monitoring of the natural environment. Artisanal and small-scale mining The Association for Responsible Mining is an independent multi-stakeholder initiative seeking to enhance equity and wellbeing in artisanal and small-scale mining communities through improved social, environmental and labour practices, governance and the implementation of ecosystem restoration practices. In 2009 ARM published the fourth updated version of the Standard Zero for Fair Trade Artisanal Gold and Associated Silver and Platinum, which expresses social and environmental standards regarding small-scale mining. Furthermore, the Fairtrade Labeling Organisation (FLO) and ARM are developing a certification for Fair-trade and Fair-mined gold and associated silver and platinum. Protected areas In any of the protected areas covered by categories I-IV of the IUCN, or those that fall under the UNESCO World Heritage Convention and the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, special measures must be taken to conserve biodiversity, natural or cultural heritage. This subject is dealt with on the sector page on Biodiversity. Transparency and tax avoidance In countries where governance is weak, activities in the mining industry may contribute to poverty, corruption and conflict. The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), supported by a coalition of governments, companies, civil society groups and investors, is a voluntary process that has established criteria for full publication and verification of company payments and government revenues from mining. The Publish What You Pay coalition, in which more than 300 civil organisations cooperate, further calls on mining companies to publish the amounts they pay to governments. This includes tax payments, royalties, concessions etc. Publish What you Pay also calls on mining companies to disclose the content of contracts and agreements between governments and mining companies and all bank investments related to resource exploitation. See the issue page on Taxation. Good governance To
avoid or at least minimise the negative impacts of the resource curse, it is
important that the development of a mining industry goes hand in hand with the
development of good, capable and trustworthy governance. The Extractives
Industries Review (EIR) by the World Bank recommends that private investments
in extractive industries should not be promoted in countries where governance
is inadequate. The review also states that before the World Bank invests in
mining projects the quality of public governance should meet certain explicit
requirements.
The legislative framework covering (the use of) natural resources varies from country to country. At the international level however, it is agreed upon that mining companies should acknowledge the sovereignty of states over their own natural resources. This concept (Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources) was enshrined in a number of United Nations resolutions. The 1962 UN Declaration on Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources gave producing countries not only the right to make decisions about the management and extraction of their natural resources, but also - as long as compensation is paid - to expropriate or nationalise land areas, if it is in the public interest to do so. Amending this declaration, the 1966 UN Resolution 2158 (XXI) dealing specifically with developing countries, recommended public-private joint ventures as the most appropriate model for development. Rights of local communities and indigenous peoples Mining companies must acknowledge and respect the rights of indigenous peoples, acknowledge their sovereignty and self-determination, and allow them decide themselves on the future use of their lands. In order to do the latter, indigenous peoples should always be informed in a full and timely manner in any prospective business, this in order to obtain their Free Prior Informed Consent for any planned activity. See the issue page on Indigenous peoples.
Besides respecting human rights it is of utmost importance that mining companies comply with the most important codes of conduct by the International Labour Organisation (ILO). These are the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and the Tripartite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy, of which the fourth version was published in March 2006. An ILO code of conduct specifically applicable for the mining sector is the 1995 Safety and Health in Mines Convention. The rights of women, related to the mining sector, are acknowledged in the Iroco Declaration. These subjects are further dealt with on the issue page on human rights and on the issue page on labour. Industry specific standards For the mining industry and some specific minerals and sub-sectors, specific standards are being developed:
content of a bank policy
The following elements should be incorporated in the banks' mining policy: essential elements
The bank will only invest in companies that:
additional elements
The bank will only invest in companies that:
The bank will:
scores
how do we score this?
The bank:
analysis scores mining
Except for twelve banks, most banks have received one point for adopting the Equator Principles and/or the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Some banks have developed a separate policy that is not accredited additional points because their criteria for lending do not cover the essential elements. Only Rabobank has a mining policy that includes requirements regarding environment, human rights, indigenous people's rights and local communities and transparency on revenues and payments. Worth mentioning is that they require a decommissioning plan including restoration of the area affected by the project. However, Rabobank still invests in companies that will not phase out the mining of polluting and dangerous energy minerals as coal and uranium. Deutsche Bank, which is not a signatory of the Equator Principle or the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, is accredited one point for developing their Greenfilter Statement. This shows the bank's commitment to "offer products that steer investments into low-carbon companies" in carbon intensive industries. However, the criteria they apply to mining companies remain unclear.
|
Loading