Corruption
Corruption is traditionally thought of as the payment of bribes. However, at the worst, corruption is the systematic looting of state resources. It is particularly insidious as it undermines the capacity of the world's poorest states to develop efficient economies and good governance. The United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) acknowledges that corruption poses serious problems to the stability and security of societies, as well as jeopardising democracy, ethical values and sustainable development.
Corruption diverts resources away from poverty alleviation into the hands of private individuals, frequently those at the top of the political system. All too often the looting of state revenues is perceived as the reward for political power. However, illicitly acquired state assets are not simply a bonus for having control of the state: they allow corrupt politicians to maintain their positions, by buying support and controlling access to resources.
According to the annual Global Corruption Report released in September 2009 by Transparency International (TI), the massive scale of corruption and its undue influence on public policy is costing billions and obstructing the path towards sustainable economic growth, even without counting revenues lost from state treasuries. In developing and transition countries alone, politicians and officials are estimated to have received bribes of up to US$ 40 billion annually. The sectors most that are most affected by corruption include public works, real estate and property development, oil and gas, heavy manufacturing and mining. For details see the Bribe Payers Index of TI.
Banks can directly or inadvertently facilitate corruption in several ways:
-readmore-
Facilitating corruption directly
At the most basic level, banks can make illicit payments to advance their own business interests. However, the most common way that banks facilitate corruption is by accepting corrupt funds as deposits. Large-scale corruption often depends upon the willingness of banks to receive the illicit proceeds, as the sums involved are too big to be kept in cash.
Doing business with companies that facilitate corruption
The payment of bribes by companies in order to get business distorts the market. It rewards the company that is willing to pay a bribe, rather than the company that will deliver the best service or product. The payment of a bribe will often lead to a company providing an inferior, or even dangerous, service or product. The devastating consequences can range from water shortages, exploitative working conditions or illegal logging to unsafe medicines and poorly or illegally constructed buildings that collapse with deadly consequences.
A company found guilty of bribery will find its social licence to operate badly damaged and its future business prospects jeopardised or even eliminated. The effective enforcement of comprehensive transparency and anti-corruption policies and practices can be seen as a companies' key indicators of management integrity and trustworthiness. By investing in companies that facilitate corruption, banks might also develop reputational risks as a result of becoming enmeshed in subsequent investigations and being publicly linked to the company involved.
In addition, if companies do not publicly disclose their legitimate payments to governments, especially related to the exploitation of natural resources, it is far easier for corrupt officials to siphon off these revenues. Without revenue transparency, the citizens of natural resource-rich countries do not know what is happening to their nation's resource wealth. This element is further discussed on the sector page on Oil and Gas, the sector page on Mining and on the issue page on Taxation.
The bank's policy should ensure that it will not accept corrupt funds or pay bribes, and will only be involved in investments to companies that fight against corruption, both by taking a stand against illicit payments (bribes) and by disclosing their legitimate payments to governments. Although corruption can be closely connected with taxation issues, the latter are further discussed on the issue page on Taxation.
The United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) represents agreed minimum global standards to tackle both bribery and money laundering. Signed by 129 nations, it sets out what states should do to prevent and criminalise corruption, and recommendations on international cooperation and asset recovery. In addition, it includes broad anti-money laundering standards. Not all Parties have effectively implemented UNCAC's provisions, but some progress was made recently as States Parties to the Convention have agreed on the implementation of a Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the UNCAC.
-readmore-
The OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention) sets out legally-binding standards that criminalise the bribery of foreign officials by international companies. Thirty-eight countries have ratified the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, but the extent to which its provisions have been effectively implemented under national law According to Transparency International few Parties are actively enforcing its requirements, while most have little or no enforcement at all.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is an inter-governmental body that sets global standards for anti-money laundering legislation. It has promulgated 40 Recommendations and 9 Special Recommendations. The 34 FATF member countries perform peer reviews to ensure that each member state's regulations are in line with the recommendations. Currently no country is fully compliant with the FATF standards. The ministers of the member countries have given FATF a renewed mandate until 2012 and in September 2009 the G20 mandated FATF to "help detect and deter the proceeds of corruption by prioritizing work to strengthen standards on customer due diligence, beneficial ownership and transparency".
FATF's standards for Know Your Customer due diligence serve as a useful baseline for banks' policies. The requirement for a bank to know who its customer is and establish their source of funds is the cornerstone of anti-money laundering standards. The following Recommendations are especially important:
- Recommendation 5 provides that banks have an obligation to identify the beneficial owner of the funds offered as deposits. If a bank is unable to do so then it should refuse to accept the funds.
One of the most important aspects of identifying the beneficial owner is to penetrate the often highly complex ownership and control structures of shell companies, trusts, corporate vehicles and secrecy jurisdictions that are used to hide true ownership of funds.
- Recommendation 6 recognises the higher risk posed by Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) and requires banks to identify them, and carry out enhanced due diligence on their transactions. A PEP is a senior public official, their family members and associates - i.e. everybody who is in a position to potentially divert public funds.
In some countries the risk that a PEP is engaged in corrupt activities and the risk of money laundering is unacceptably high. In deciding whether a country has such a reputation, banks can draw on Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index, Freedom House's ‘Worst of the Worst' and IMF reports on revenue transparency. To identify sectors which are corruption prone, Transparency International's Bribe Payers Index is very informative. In addition, the World Bank provides a World Bank Listing of Ineligible Firms and individuals that are ineligible to be awarded a World Bank-financed contract because they were found to have violated the fraud and corruption provisions of World Bank Guidelines.
In December 2003, Transparency International published the Business Principles for Countering Bribery, a framework that helps companies to develop comprehensive anti-bribery programmes. Whilst many large companies do have no-bribery policies, too few implement these policies effectively. The 2009 edition places greater emphasis on public reporting of anti-bribery systems and in recommending that enterprises commission external verification or assurance of their anti-bribery programme. Transparency International has various tools for companies to support them fighting corruption, including the Corruption Fighters' Tool Kit which offers companies innovative anti-corruption methods.
The Wolfsberg Group is an association of eleven global banks largely involved in the field of private banking (banking for wealthy persons). It aims to develop industry standards and tools for Know Your Customer, Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-corruption policies. In this respect the Wolfsberg Group, among others, developed the following standards:
- The Wolfsberg Anti-Money Laundering Principles on Private Banking, which was revised in May 2002;
- The Wolfsberg Statement against Corruption in February 2008.
The following elements should be incorporated in the bank's corruption policy:
The bank will, in its own operations:
- Fully implement FATF Recommendation 5 by identifying the ultimate beneficial owner or controller of funds offered. If banks cannot do so, the funds should not be accepted. This standard should be implemented across all of the bank's global holdings, even if the locally applicable regulations in particular jurisdictions are not at the same standard;
- Fully implement FATF Recommendation 6 by identifying Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) and conducting adequate due diligence on them, the source of their funds and their transactions. In this respect, the banks should have a system to identify new customers who may be PEPs and existing customers that become PEPs. This standard should be implemented across all of their global holdings, even if the locally applicable regulations in particular jurisdictions are not at the same standard;
- Prevent its employees from paying or receiving bribes, especially if they operate in a jurisdiction that has not ratified or implemented the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention;
- Define sectors, countries and companies that require heightened due diligence, suing tools such as the Corruption Perceptions Index, Bribe Payers Index, Freedom House's ‘Worst of the Worst' and the IMF reports on revenue transparency.
Furthermore, the bank will not invest in companies:
- Involved in corruption practices by carrying out enhanced customer due diligence, using for example the World Bank Listing of Ineligible Firms.
The bank will not:
- Accept funds from PEPs unless they have strong evidence that the funds are legitimate;
- Open accounts for PEPs from countries whose own laws prohibit them from holding accounts outside that country.
Furthermore, the bank will not invest in companies that:
- Have no clear and well-implemented anti-bribery policy;
- Do not publicly disclose revenue payments they make to governments (see sector page on Mining, sector page on Oil and Gas and issue page on Taxation).
- The bank has no investment policy for this issue;
-
The bank:
has only adopted or signed onto a voluntary standard or initiative relevant; or
has developed its own policy, but it is vaguely worded without clear commitments; - The bank has developed its own policy,
that includes at least half of the essential elements;
- The bank has developed its own policy
and
this includes the essential elements in its lending and investment banking; or
this includes the essential elements in its asset management - The bank has developed its own policy
and
this includes the essential elements in its lending and investment banking as well as its asset management; or
this includes both the essential and additional elements in its lending and investment banking; or
this includes both the essential and additional elements in its asset management; - The bank has developed its own policy and this includes both the essential and additional elements in its lending and investment banking as well as its asset management.
| Spain | Santander |
2
|
|---|---|
| Canada | RBC |
2
|
| Norway | DnB |
2
|
| Belgium | KBC |
2
|
| United Kingdom | Standard Chartered |
2
|
| Brazil | Itaú-Unibanco |
1
|
| United States | JPMorgan Chase |
1
|
| United States | Goldman Sachs |
1
|
| United Kingdom | HSBC |
1
|
| Netherlands | ING Group |
1
|
| Italy | Intesa Sanpaolo |
1
|
| Netherlands | Rabobank |
1
|
| Germany | WestLB |
1
|
| Australia | Westpac |
1
|
| Italy | UniCredit Group |
1
|
| Switzerland | UBS |
1
|
| South Africa | Nedbank |
1
|
| Japan | Mizuho |
1
|
| Belgium | Dexia |
1
|
| United Kingdom | Barclays |
1
|
| Spain | BBVA |
1
|
| Japan | Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ |
1
|
| Brazil | Banco do Brasil |
1
|
| Australia | ANZ |
1
|
| Brazil | Banco Bradesco |
1
|
| Netherlands | ABN AMRO |
1
|
| France | BNP Paribas |
1
|
| Germany | Deutsche Bank |
1
|
| Denmark | Danske Bank |
1
|
| Switzerland | Credit Suisse |
1
|
| United States | Citi |
1
|
| France | Crédit Agricole |
1
|
| Germany | DekaBank |
0
|
| China | Agricultural Bank of China |
0
|
| China | Bank of China |
0
|
| China | China Construction Bank |
0
|
| United States | Bank of America |
0
|
| China | Industrial Commercial Bank of China |
0
|
A number of banks have signed the Wolfsberg Principles and/or UN Global Compact and have their own policies in place. Most of the banks incorporated the prevention of corruption in a Code of Conduct.
The points for ANZ, Morgan Stanley, National Australia Bank, and RBC are solely based on their own policies, mainly because they have procedures in place to prevent employees from bribery and corruption. The Chinese Industrial Bank is awarded one point because its policy is very broad, referring to national laws and the FATF recommendations. The bank will not open anonymous accounts and will not deal with shell banks, but the policy does not set specific criteria for its clients and employees to avoid complicity in corruption and bribery. Only three banks are accredited additional points for having the identification of the beneficiary owner of funds and identifying PEP's in their own policy (Royal Bank of Canada, Standard Chartered Bank and Santander).
|
Son of Equatorial Guinea’s dictator plans one of world’s most expensive yachts Feb 28, 2011 | Global Witness Global Witness has learned that Teodorin Obiang, the notorious son of Equatorial Guinea's long-ruling dictator, commissioned… |
|
Don’t make it easier for dictators to steal Feb 24, 2011 | Global Witness This comment piece by Anthea Lawson, the head of Global Witness's Kleptocracycampaign, was published in the Financial… |
|
Sudanese president may have $9 billion with Lloyds bank Dec 18, 2010 | Global Witness UK Taxpayer-funded Lloyds bank may have "stashed" $9 billion for President Omar al-Bashir of Sudan, according to Wikileaks… |
|
British banks complicit in Nigerian corruption, court documents reveal Oct 11, 2010 | Global Witness British high street banks have accepted millions of pounds in deposits from corrupt Nigerian politicians, raising serious… |
|
Global Witness applauds RBS penalty over terrorist financing Aug 04, 2010 | Global Witness Global Witness welcomes the decisive action taken by the UK financial regulator, the FSA, which has fined the Royal Bank… |
|
International thief thief Oct 11, 2010 | Global Witness How British banks are complicit in Nigerian corruption |
|
Anti Money Laundering policy Jun 17, 2010 | KBC |
|
KBC Group Anti-Corruption and Bribery Policy Feb 16, 2010 | KBC |
|
Statement on Bribery and Corruption Dec 04, 2009 | Barclays |
|
Corporate policy for the fight against corruption and bribery Jun 09, 2009 | Banco Itaú policy of Itaú against corruption |
|
Preventing and combating Money Laundering May 25, 2009 | Banco do Brasil retrieved from website |
|
Policy guidelines against corruption, money laundering and terrorism financing Oct 04, 2008 | Banco Bradesco policy guidelines |
|
Anti money laundering policy Jun 25, 2005 | Standard chartered |
|
Anti Money Laundering policy Apr 18, 2011 | Standard Chartered date mentioned is date doc. is found on SC website |
|
Financial Economic Crime Jan 04, 2011 | ING statement to to combat money laundering and the funding of terrorist and criminal activities. |
|
Anti money laundering policy Mar 30, 2010 | Industrial Bank date mentioned is date found |
|
RBC financial group global approach to anti-money laundering Mar 25, 2010 | RBC Dats mentioned is date found |
|
Statement on anti-money laundering policies and procedures Jan 04, 2010 | Corpbanca |
|
Policy on anti-money laundering and combating terrorism financing Sep 11, 2009 | Millennium BCP |
|
Anti money laundering/ anti terrorist statement Jan 09, 2009 | Scotiabank statement |
|
Group Whistleblower policy Jan 01, 2008 | National Australia Bank Group includes corruption |
|
Anti money laundering policy Aug 01, 2007 | Santander Money -laundering prevention santander group global policy |
