english
français
español
中国版
issues
Biodiversity
Climate change
Corruption
Human rights
Indigenous peoples
Labour
Operation in conflict zones
Taxation
Toxics
sectors
Transparency
Accountability
|
banks
loading...
focus
loading...
members
loading...
dodgy deals
loading...
companies
loading...
further resources
news releases
documents
dodgy deals
Corruption what is at stake
Corruption is traditionally thought of as the payment of bribes. However, at the worst, corruption is the systematic looting of state resources. It is particularly insidious as it undermines the capacity of the world's poorest states to develop efficient economies and good governance. The United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) acknowledges that corruption poses serious problems to the stability and security of societies, as well as jeopardising democracy, ethical values and sustainable development. Corruption diverts resources away from poverty alleviation into the hands of private individuals, frequently those at the top of the political system. All too often the looting of state revenues is perceived as the reward for political power. However, illicitly acquired state assets are not simply a bonus for having control of the state: they allow corrupt politicians to maintain their positions, by buying support and controlling access to resources. According to the annual Global Corruption Report released in September 2009 by Transparency International (TI), the massive scale of corruption and its undue influence on public policy is costing billions and obstructing the path towards sustainable economic growth, even without counting revenues lost from state treasuries. In developing and transition countries alone, politicians and officials are estimated to have received bribes of up to US$ 40 billion annually. The sectors most that are most affected by corruption include public works, real estate and property development, oil and gas, heavy manufacturing and mining. For details see the Bribe Payers Index of TI. Banks can directly or inadvertently facilitate corruption in several ways: -readmore- Facilitating corruption directly At the most basic level, banks can make illicit payments to advance their own business interests. However, the most common way that banks facilitate corruption is by accepting corrupt funds as deposits. Large-scale corruption often depends upon the willingness of banks to receive the illicit proceeds, as the sums involved are too big to be kept in cash. Doing business with companies that facilitate corruption The payment of bribes by companies in order to get business distorts the market. It rewards the company that is willing to pay a bribe, rather than the company that will deliver the best service or product. The payment of a bribe will often lead to a company providing an inferior, or even dangerous, service or product. The devastating consequences can range from water shortages, exploitative working conditions or illegal logging to unsafe medicines and poorly or illegally constructed buildings that collapse with deadly consequences. A company found guilty of bribery will find its social licence to operate badly damaged and its future business prospects jeopardised or even eliminated. The effective enforcement of comprehensive transparency and anti-corruption policies and practices can be seen as a companies' key indicators of management integrity and trustworthiness. By investing in companies that facilitate corruption, banks might also develop reputational risks as a result of becoming enmeshed in subsequent investigations and being publicly linked to the company involved. In addition, if companies do not publicly disclose their legitimate payments to governments, especially related to the exploitation of natural resources, it is far easier for corrupt officials to siphon off these revenues. Without revenue transparency, the citizens of natural resource-rich countries do not know what is happening to their nation's resource wealth. This element is further discussed on the sector page on Oil and Gas, the sector page on Mining and on the issue page on Taxation. The bank's policy should ensure that it will not accept corrupt funds or pay bribes, and will only be involved in investments to companies that fight against corruption, both by taking a stand against illicit payments (bribes) and by disclosing their legitimate payments to governments. Although corruption can be closely connected with taxation issues, the latter are further discussed on the issue page on Taxation.
selected standards and initiatives
The United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) represents agreed minimum global standards to tackle both bribery and money laundering. Signed by 129 nations, it sets out what states should do to prevent and criminalise corruption, and recommendations on international cooperation and asset recovery. In addition, it includes broad anti-money laundering standards. Not all Parties have effectively implemented UNCAC's provisions, but some progress was made recently as States Parties to the Convention have agreed on the implementation of a Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the UNCAC. -readmore- The OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention) sets out legally-binding standards that criminalise the bribery of foreign officials by international companies. Thirty-eight countries have ratified the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, but the extent to which its provisions have been effectively implemented under national law According to Transparency International few Parties are actively enforcing its requirements, while most have little or no enforcement at all. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is an inter-governmental body that sets global standards for anti-money laundering legislation. It has promulgated 40 Recommendations and 9 Special Recommendations. The 34 FATF member countries perform peer reviews to ensure that each member state's regulations are in line with the recommendations. Currently no country is fully compliant with the FATF standards. The ministers of the member countries have given FATF a renewed mandate until 2012 and in September 2009 the G20 mandated FATF to "help detect and deter the proceeds of corruption by prioritizing work to strengthen standards on customer due diligence, beneficial ownership and transparency". FATF's standards for Know Your Customer due diligence serve as a useful baseline for banks' policies. The requirement for a bank to know who its customer is and establish their source of funds is the cornerstone of anti-money laundering standards. The following Recommendations are especially important:
One of the most important aspects of identifying the beneficial owner is to penetrate the often highly complex ownership and control structures of shell companies, trusts, corporate vehicles and secrecy jurisdictions that are used to hide true ownership of funds.
In some countries the risk that a PEP is engaged in corrupt activities and the risk of money laundering is unacceptably high. In deciding whether a country has such a reputation, banks can draw on Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index, Freedom House's ‘Worst of the Worst' and IMF reports on revenue transparency. To identify sectors which are corruption prone, Transparency International's Bribe Payers Index is very informative. In addition, the World Bank provides a World Bank Listing of Ineligible Firms and individuals that are ineligible to be awarded a World Bank-financed contract because they were found to have violated the fraud and corruption provisions of World Bank Guidelines. In December 2003, Transparency International published the Business Principles for Countering Bribery, a framework that helps companies to develop comprehensive anti-bribery programmes. Whilst many large companies do have no-bribery policies, too few implement these policies effectively. The 2009 edition places greater emphasis on public reporting of anti-bribery systems and in recommending that enterprises commission external verification or assurance of their anti-bribery programme. Transparency International has various tools for companies to support them fighting corruption, including the Corruption Fighters' Tool Kit which offers companies innovative anti-corruption methods. The Wolfsberg Group is an association of eleven global banks largely involved in the field of private banking (banking for wealthy persons). It aims to develop industry standards and tools for Know Your Customer, Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-corruption policies. In this respect the Wolfsberg Group, among others, developed the following standards:
content of a bank policy
The following elements should be incorporated in the bank's corruption policy: essential elements
The bank will, in its own operations:
Furthermore, the bank will not invest in companies:
additional elements
The bank will not:
Furthermore, the bank will not invest in companies that:
scores
how do we score this?
analysis scores corruption
A number of banks have signed the Wolfsberg Principles and/or UN Global Compact and have their own policies in place. Most of the banks incorporated the prevention of corruption in a Code of Conduct. The points for ANZ, Morgan Stanley, National Australia Bank, and RBC are solely based on their own policies, mainly because they have procedures in place to prevent employees from bribery and corruption. The Chinese Industrial Bank is awarded one point because its policy is very broad, referring to national laws and the FATF recommendations. The bank will not open anonymous accounts and will not deal with shell banks, but the policy does not set specific criteria for its clients and employees to avoid complicity in corruption and bribery. Only three banks are accredited additional points for having the identification of the beneficiary owner of funds and identifying PEP's in their own policy (Royal Bank of Canada, Standard Chartered Bank and Santander).
|
Loading