This project is not yet fully funded, and is a no go for banks. It is closely tracked by BankTrack.
Power station of Rybnik. Source: Wikimedia Commons ( User:Przykuta)
A new 910 MWe (electrical megawatt) unit is planned for the hard
coal-fired Rybnik power station, located on the outskirts of the city of Rybnik
in Silesia Voivodship, to be constructed by Électricité de France (EDF).
This area is the most industrialized region of Poland, and is
where most of the hard-coal mines and the majority of hard-coal power plants
are located. Currently the Rybnik power plant has a generation capacity of 1775
MWe, installed in eight blocks, and is the biggest power plant in the Silesia
region. The power generated in Rybnik - exceeding 9000 GWh - makes up 7% of the
installed electric power in the Polish energy system, and its annual coal
consumption is around 4 million tons. The new 910 MWe coal unit was due to
replace the (almost 40 year old) units 1, 2, 3 and 4 that were to be shut down
before 1st of January 2016.
The new unit would cost EUR 1.8 billion, which EDF planned
to cover from the group's own capital. However due to the increase in costs due
to the Fukushima accident in 2011 and the economic downturn, it is no longer
certain whether EDF is able to invest this sum without resorting to the
In December 2012 EDF announced the suspension of the project,
initially for three months. EDF stated that the reasons for the suspension of
the project were:
the decision of the European Commission in July
2012 not to include the Rybnik plant in the National Investment Plan because it
would not contribute to the modernisation of the Polish energy system. This
decision meant the plant would not receive free CO2 emissions allowances under Article 10c of the EU ETS directive; and prevents the Rybnik
plant from benefiting from a state aid package of EUR 7.1 billion. (Source: European
the projected abolition of support for the
co-firing of coal and biomass in the most recent draft of the Polish renewable
energy law (as the planned unit is projected to generate up to 10% of its energy from co-firing of hard coal with biomass);
the dire economic outlook and the projected
decrease in energy demand as compared to the 2008-2009 forecasts on which the investment
The economic case for shelving the project is growing. Both
EDF and the Polish authorities are exerting strong pressure upon the European
Commission to modify its decision from 13th July 2012, and the company is
heavily lobbying the Polish law-makers to maintain the current support for
Although the group did not say it is dropping it definitely,
it has given a statement (via Gerard Roth, Vice-president of EDF for
continental Europe) that it will not close units 1-4 but will ‘modernise' them
instead so they meet the IED directive standards and are able to operate for
another 15 years. In this way the original replacement argument is becoming
meaningless. A quick search in the English speaking media revealed that as
usual this news appeared only in Polish.
The project remains suspended. In July 2013 EDF maintained its decision to suspend the investment. In the meantime, EDF will invest EUR300m
in modernising existing units. Were EDF to continue with the investment, the
new unit would produce approximately 4.7 million tons of CO2 per year.
what must happen
As long as the European Commission maintains its decision
from July 2012 that the project will not be incorporated into National
Investment Plan, and support for coal with biomass co-firing is scaled down by
70% as in the latest version of the law, EDF is unlikely to resume the
investment. The decision to abandon this risky investment could be hastened by
one of EDF's main creditor banks raising doubts about the project's economic
In the case that the project proceeds, any private bank should participate to its financing in any way.
One of the
main problems presented by the new units is the health impact of coal
combustion on the citizens of Silesia region. The investment area is
characterised by bad air quality. On 21st November 2011, the European
Commission sued Poland in the European Court of Justice for lack of progress in
its implementation of the Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe (CAFE)
Directive (2008/50/EC), which should have been implemented in Poland by the
11th of June 2010. The directive requires in particular that the PM10 (larger
dust particles) level does not exceed 50 miligrams/m³ more than 35 times a
year. However this PM10 level is breached with much higher frequency in many
Polish metropolitan areas including Jaworzno and Rybnik in the Silesia region. Recently
a group of residents of Rybnik have taken the Polish state to court over the
bad air quality and the lack of clear plans to improve the situation in the foreseeable
future. Protests over poor air quality have already led to changes in the
regional legislation in the neighbouring Malopolskie Voivoship and its capital,
health impacts from coal mining, transportation and combustion are also a
significant concern, and communities living in proximity to these activities are
experiencing adverse social impacts, such as displacement, and loss of social
capital as well as facing increased risks of respiratory disease, heart
disease, and lung cancer. Moreover use of large quantities of forest biomass can
result in price increases and negative impacts on other sectors including paper,
furniture and construction. As the power sector "sucks out" almost all
available biomass from the market, smaller CHP and heating plants which could
take advantage of local biomass potential are more likely to refrain from adjusting
these plants to co-firing.
addition, burning coal causes health related problems related to coal ash and
air pollution. The plant also contributes to the region becoming ‘locked in' to
coal-based energy production for the next 40-50 years, making the shift to a
renewable energy based society all the more difficult. Construction of the new
Rybnik unit would prolong the dependence of the Silesia region on coal,
potentially leading to new investments into coal mining. This increases the risk
of ‘stranded assets' as the requirements of climate and energy policy place
ever-increasing pressure on the coal-based energy generation.
Burning coal is one of the most polluting methods of energy
production. It causes significant changes to air quality through emissions of
toxic substances such as SO2, NOx, small and large dust particles (PM10 and
PM2.5) and heavy metals such as mercury and cadmium. Coal burning is also the
largest single contributor to GHG emissions worldwide and thus has an impact on
the climate of the region and the planet. Coal mining and coal combustion also
cause serious water shortages and pollution both by modifying ground and
subterranean water flows and sewage discharges that affect river and sea flora
One of the most serious secondary effects of pollution from
coal combustion is ocean acidification and acid rains. The Silesia region and Rybnik
city itself are already struggling with chronically poor air conditions, and
the new unit would do little to improve this situation. In fact replacing the
ageing units 1 to 4 with small renewables based co-generation heat and power
plants and drastically improving thermal efficiency of the buildings in Rybnik
and Silesia region as a whole would lead both to the improvement of the air
quality in the region as well as to increase of energy security and employment
Both the Polish constitution and European Union legislation
guarantee the right to live in a clean environment, and the quality of the air
that citizens breathe every day is part of that right. The local health impacts
from coal mining, transportation and combustion are also a significant concern,
and communities living in proximity to these activities experience adverse
social impacts including displacement and loss of social capital, as well as
facing increased risks of respiratory disease, heart disease, and lung cancer.
The full costs of energy generated from coal are not fully
accounted for. For example, a series of subsidies are still provided to the
coal sector in Poland, at both local and national levels.
In the case of the Rybnik power plant the decision of the
city council of Rybnik exempted EDF's investment from real estate tax, while coal
and biomass co-firing falls under the definition of renewable energy and thus
receives direct state support in the form of green certificates.
In 2011 over 50% of "renewable energy" produced in Poland
originated from co-firing and EDF was by far the biggest beneficiary.
Additionally EDF will receive a part of its CO2 emission allowances
in the period 2013-2019 for its power plants in Poland instead of having to
purchase them on auctions, and is listed as a company that will be exempted
from having to apply the Industrial Emissions Directive for all of its Polish
power plants from 1st January 2016. All these subsidies distort the ability of
the financial sector to take investment decisions based on unbiased economic calculations.
This project is not yet fully funded, and is a no go for banks. It is closely tracked by BankTrack.
financial institutions involved
It is not clear which financial institution would risk providing private finance to the new Rybnik hard-coal unit given current market volatility and legal uncertainty on the horizon. However EDF's five biggest creditors - BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, Barclays, Societe Generale and HSBC - should all be well-informed about the social and environmental risks associated with this project.
The following companies are involved in Rybnik coal power plant:
- profile The tender for supplying the boiler and the turbine hall to the new unit in Rybnik has been won by Alstom and is valued at 900 million euros. Alstom has historically been involved in corruption scandals around the world-ranging from Indonesia, through Zambia, Malaysia, Latvia, Brazil and Tunisia to Slovenia.
Electricite de France (EDF)
- profile This is the largest electric utility company in the world. It specialises in electricity, from engineering to distribution Operator of Rybnik power station. EDF is the biggest foreign investor in the Polish energy sector with a market share of 10% in electricity production and 20% in the Polish heating market. Companies forming EDF group in Poland produce energy predominantly on the basis of coal. EDF is the second largest buyer of hard coal in Poland.