Keystone XL pipeline United States pdf

Main
Basics
Issues
Update
Finance
Companies
News
Documents
Media
image
The current and proposed pipeline path from the Canadian Tar Sands through the US. Source: https://tarsandspipelines.wordpress.com
description

TransCanada is proposing a 36-inch, 1,700 mile pipeline, that would carry 900,000 barrels of Tar Sands oil from Hardisy, Alberta to Port Arthur, Texas. The pipeline system, worth U.S. $12 billion, is currently being built in order to link the growing supply of Canadian crude oil to the largest refining markets in the United States. The 36-inch pipeline would connect to storage and distribution facilities at Cushing, a major crude oil marketing/refining and pipeline hub.

The pipeline would go through six different states, and cross major rivers, including the Missouri River and the Red River. The giant oil corporations that have invested in the Canadian tar sands are hoping the Keystone XL will make oil extraction even more profitable. In fact, the aim is to double imports of dirty tar sands oil into the United States.


brief history

 


what must happen

Private banks must not participate to the funding of this project, whatever forms it takes, be it project finance, general corporate loans or underwriting of shares or bonds on the stock markets of the companies involved.


location
image
active file
last update: Mar 05, 2014

sectors
oil and gas

banktrack contact

Yann Louvel, Climate and energy campaign coordinator, BankTrack


member groups involved

share this dodgy deal
social impact

The social impacts of the project concern mostly the surrounding local communities (both indigenous and non-indigenous). These implications range from health issues, destruction of local environment, contamination of water, implications on farm production, possible destruction on local indigenous artefacts, concerns for local economies in case of a leak in the pipeline, and much more.

For example:

  • In 2007, Alberta's government approved the withdrawal of 119.5 BILLON gallons of water for tar sands extraction. An estimated 82% of this water comes from the Athabasca River. Toxic wastewater is discharged in holding or tailing ponds that now leak 11 million litres of toxic waste per day into the Athabasca and seep into the ground water. This water flows northward (downstream) further into Indigenous territories. Since this toxic waste has been flowing into the river and seeping into the groundwater, rare and virulent cancers have affected many of the Indigenous Community members, and fish and game have been found with physical abnormalities, deformations and tumors.
  • This is also a concern for other communities along the path as the pipeline crosses large water reserves. If there was a leak there could be contamination in drinking water for millions of Americans and devastate the mid-western U.S. economy.

environment

There are various levels of concern for the environment here, from the original stages of production, to the processing and transportation of the oil.

For Example:

  • The toxic waste run off has had detrimental effects on the surrounding environment. In short, the pipeline could pollute air and water supplies and harm migratory birds, fish, and other wildlife.
  • The path of the pipeline crosses the Sanhills of Nebraska, which is the largest wetland ecosystem in the United States, as well as the Ogallala Aquifer, which is one of the largest reserves of fresh water in the world.
  • Some of the pipeline will also cross an active earthquake zone with a magnitude of 4.3 as recently as 2002. It is argued that TransCanada applied to the U.S. government to use thinner steel and pump at higher pressures than normal. Meaning, a leak is not out of the question. More information.
  • At the same time, in order to expand production capacity in the Tar Sands, Exxon is currently seeking permission to haul 200 loads of equipment from Port of Lewiston, ID, along the LoLo Pass to Missoula, MT, with the final destination of the Tar Sands. These shipments are 24 feet wide, 30 feet tall, and up to 262 feet long, weighing up to 500,000 pounds. Many upgrades will be necessary to follow through with this plan as the current route runs through a delicate ecosystem on an unprepared roadway. These transformations would include relocating power and telephone lines, widening and strengthening banks, curves and the road base. Full report here.

human rights

As stated by Francois Paulette of the Smith's Landing Treaty 8 First Nation of the Northwest Territories,  "White House policy makers need to know that their appetite for this dirty oil is killing our river and destroying our way of life. The pollutants and heavy metals don't stop at the Alberta border - they run more than 1,000 kilometres all the way to the Mackenzie River, deforming the fish along the way."

There has been much opposition from indigenous groups from both Canada and the U.S. So much so that groups from both countries have joined forces to oppose the project together. According to the Toronto star, there is almost unanimous opposition to the pipeline among tribal communities living close to the proposed pipeline's U.S. route.

Amongst the various health and environmental concerns, another major concern is that the project will disrupt and/or destroy traditional native burial sites in the Sandhills region of Nebraska. Under U.S. law, any such disturbance disqualifies such sites from future inclusion in the National Historic Registry. Full article here.

image
active file
last update: Mar 05, 2014

sectors
oil and gas

banktrack contact

Yann Louvel, Climate and energy campaign coordinator, BankTrack


member groups involved

share this dodgy deal
May 04, 2011

Recently, support for the project has been reaffirmed through a revised environmental study issued April 16th 2011 by the U.S. State Department. The draft EIS backs last years conclusion which claimed that the pipeline would have "limited adverse environmental impacts." A report released in February 2011 by the Department of Energy states that the pipeline, "could essentially eliminate Middle East crude imports longer term." A tentative decision date was given by the State Department for October 2011.

On June 30, 2010, the commercial operation of the first phase of the Keystone pipeline was commenced by TransCanada. The first stage encompassed the conversion of natural gas pipeline to crude oil pipeline and a construction of a "bullet line" that brings the crude oil non-stop from Canada to market hubs in the U.S. Midwest.

Before TransCanada can begin construction, however, the company needs a presidential permit from the Obama administration. According to a speech in an event she spoke at in October 2010, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would still be inclined to support the Keystone XL mega pipeline. Full transcript here. President Obama's administration is currently considering the fate of the Keystone XL pipeline. These approvals are thought to encourage the supply of oil and halt the transition to clean and renewable energy.

image
active file
last update: Mar 05, 2014

sectors
oil and gas

banktrack contact

Yann Louvel, Climate and energy campaign coordinator, BankTrack


member groups involved

share this dodgy deal
This project is not yet fully funded, and is a no go for banks. It is closely tracked by BankTrack.
financial institutions involved
banks
Bank of Montreal Canada
  • corporate loan: $500 million (2007-2010)
    source: Bloomberg
  • shares/bonds underwriter or manager: $2.2 billion (USD) (2007-2010)
    source: Bloomberg
Citigroup United States - profile
  • shares/bonds underwriter or manager: $2.58 billion (2007-2010)
    general purpose
    source: Bloomberg
JPMorgan Chase United States - profile
  • shares/bonds underwriter or manager: $2.08 billion (2007-2010)
    general purpose
    source: Bloomberg
Royal Bank of Canada Canada - profile
  • corporate loan: $500 million (2007-2010)
    general purpose
    source: Bloomberg
  • shares/bonds underwriter or manager: $1.8 billion (2007-2010)
    source: Bloomberg
Scotia Bank Canada - profile
  • shares/bonds underwriter or manager: $999 million (USD) (2007-2010)
    preferred shares
    source: Bloomberg
TD bank Financial Group Canada - profile
  • shares/bonds underwriter or manager: $1.6 billion (USD) (2007-2010)
    source: Bloomberg
  • corporate loan: $993 million (USD) (2007-2010)
    source: Bloomberg

image
active file
last update: Mar 05, 2014

sectors
oil and gas

banktrack contact

Yann Louvel, Climate and energy campaign coordinator, BankTrack


member groups involved

share this dodgy deal

The following companies are involved in Keystone XL pipeline:

image
active file
last update: Mar 05, 2014

sectors
oil and gas

banktrack contact

Yann Louvel, Climate and energy campaign coordinator, BankTrack


member groups involved

share this dodgy deal
2013 2011
image
active file
last update: Mar 05, 2014

sectors
oil and gas

banktrack contact

Yann Louvel, Climate and energy campaign coordinator, BankTrack


member groups involved

share this dodgy deal
image
active file
last update: Mar 05, 2014

sectors
oil and gas

banktrack contact

Yann Louvel, Climate and energy campaign coordinator, BankTrack


member groups involved

share this dodgy deal
videos

Tar Sands Action By “Gasland” Director Josh Fox
Aug 22, 2011 -

Oil On Lubicon Land: A Photo Essay
Jun 21, 2011 - Melina Laboucan-Massimo, a member of the Lubicon Cree First Nation and a Climate and Energy Campaigner with Greenpeace, describes the impact of oil and gas developments and the recent oil spill in the traditional territory of the Lubicon Cree in northern Alberta.

BigRig
Feb 01, 2011 - ExxonMobil has proposed building a high/wide corridor through some of the most pristine lands in Idaho and Montana. This new route would facilitate shipment of equipment manufactured in Korea to be used in the Alberta tar sands.

Keystone XL- Get the Facts
Feb 01, 2011 - On February 18, 2010, the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission voted to approve Keystone XL pipeline. Get the facts.

Will President Obama prevent the NEXT oil spill disaster?
Feb 01, 2011 - President Obama pledged to learn the lessons of the BP Gulf oil spill disaster - and prevent future spills. The dirty tar sands oil Keystone XL pipeline is his chance to put his money where his mouth is.

image
active file
last update: Mar 05, 2014

sectors
oil and gas

banktrack contact

Yann Louvel, Climate and energy campaign coordinator, BankTrack


member groups involved

share this dodgy deal
Login
username
password
Good login. Redirecting to
'My Banktrack'.
Wrong login. Click here to request your password.
An email has been sent with your login!
Request password
This email is unknown.
<< Back
Search
Please provide one or more search terms

Join our mailinglist

Get all our latest news releases delivered straight to your inbox - or get our News Digest once a month

banktrack tweets
RT @RAN: Today, our friends are visiting @Barclays, #1 financier of mountaintop removal #coal. Will you back them up? http://t.co/7zkwJW6oi
Apr 24, 2014
RT @moveyourmoneyuk: Look out for us live tweeting the juicy bits from the Barclays AGM today http://t.co/qLMaVl24Z3
Apr 24, 2014
contact
route
Vismarkt 15
6511 VJ Nijmegen
Netherlands


contact@banktrack.org
Contact us