ActiveThis profile is actively maintained
Last update: 2016-09-12 15:38:30
Ric Lander, Friends of the Earth Scotland
Share this page:
RBS was founded in 1727 and is one of the major UK banks. RBS has 40 million customers using the financial services of over 30 brands, including NatWest, Direct Line, Churchill, Coutts, Ulster Bank and Citizens.
After a massive bailout in 2008, RBS is now a UK government owned institution. In 2014 RBS embarked on a restructuring process that will see the bank operate mainly in the UK and Ireland by 2019. The strategy is expained here.
Gogarburn 175 Glasgow Road
EH12 1HQ Edinburgh
Ross McEwan |
Group Chief Executive
RBS Sustainability Report 2015|
Annual Report and Accounts 2015
Annual Results for the year ended 31 December 2015
listed on London Stock Exchange
RBS has been effectively nationalised by the UK government, who has taken an 85 per cent share in the bank in 2008. Currently it still holds around 73 per cent of the shares.
Voluntary initiativesRBS has committed itself to the following voluntary standards:
- Banking Environment Initiative
- Carbon Disclosure Project
- Dow Jones Sustainability Indices
- Equator Principles
- Global Reporting Initiative
- International Labour Organization Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work
- OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises
- Soft Commodities Compact
- Thun Group on Human Rights
- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
- UNEP Finance Initiative
- United Nations Global Compact
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- Wolfsberg Principles
RBS investment policies can be found here.
Forestry, Fisheries and Agribusiness Sectors
BankTrack campaigns and RBS
True leader Front runner Follower Laggard
BankTrack has assessed RBS on its implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in June 2016. RBS is assessed as a Follower, with a total score of 5/12.
Implementation and reporting
RBS is reporting on the implementation here.
Contact and complaints
Equator Principles Dodgy Deals
Nine of the world's top 20 funders of coal won't touch additional coal terminals at Abbot Point
In 2014, JP Morgan, Cit, Barclays and Royal Bank of Scotland all responded to a worldwide pressure campaign of NGOs, including Banktrack, urgewald, Greenpeace and Market Forces, by announcing that they would not help finance the expansion of the Abbot Point coal terminal in Australia. While ANZ and others remain tied to the deal for now, these banks did the right thing in foregoing this destructive deal that threatens the Great Barrier Reef.
Thun Group of Banks agrees to consider remedy for victims of human rights abuse
In 2013 the seven-strong Thun Group of Banks' produced a discussion paper on banks' responsibilities under new UN human rights guidelines. BankTrack's response to the paper highlighted that the banks had failed to address their responsibility to provide access to remedy to victims of human rights abuses. After we pushed the point further at a conference with the banks in 2014, they agreed to "explore options for addressing ... access to remedy." We look forward to the outcome.
More US and European Banks step back from Mountaintop Removal
In 2013, BNP Paribas pledged to cut financing for top producers of mountaintop removal coal. In spring 2014, JPMorgan Chase updated its environmental policy committing to aggressively reduce its financing relationships with mountaintop removal coal mining companies. And in April 2014, Royal Bank of Scotland followed suit, updating their environmental policies to prohibit financing to companies who are "significant producers of coal using mountaintop removal (MTR) mining in Appalachia."
Platform's "Oyal Bank of Scotland" campaign forces concessions
Together with the UK student network People & Planet and the National Union of Students, Platform's "Oyal Bank of Scotland" campaign led to thousands of postcards being signed, stickers put up, and student demonstrations focused on the climate impacts of RBS financing fossil fuels. Following the campaign, RBS stopped denying climate change or promoting itself publicly as "the Oil & Gas Bank", and the Chairman was forced to respond publicly to demands that the bank report on its embedded emissions.